Chun Wang, co-founder of main Bitcoin mining pool F2Pool, pushed again towards a proposed short-term comfortable fork geared toward limiting knowledge spam on the Bitcoin community.
Wang wrote in a Monday X put up that “BIP-444 is a nasty thought.” He added that he, and presumably F2Pool, are “not going to comfortable fork something,” whether or not it’s “short-term or not.”
He mentioned, “Really feel unhappy that some devs [are] shifting additional and additional within the unsuitable course.”
Bitcoin Enchancment Proposal (BIP)-444 is a brief soft-fork proposal for the Bitcoin community geared toward limiting the inclusion of arbitrary knowledge, which its proponents view primarily as spam. The comfortable fork would restrict non-transaction knowledge — which permits various makes use of for the Bitcoin blockchain — to 83 bytes, amongst different limitations.
Associated: Bitcoin improve is splitting builders and purists
BIP-444 and its raison d’être
BIP-444 seems to be a response to a late September replace from main Bitcoin node software program Bitcoin Core. The replace in query eliminated the 80-byte cap on OP_RETURNpart of a transaction script that enables customers to embed arbitrary knowledge.
Many have considered the change as company seize of the Bitcoin blockchain, because it permits corporations to construct layer 2s and different infrastructure on Bitcoin. Moreover, some argue that permitting extra arbitrary knowledge onchain leads to sooner will increase in blockchain dimension, larger node necessities and larger centralization.
Others identified that that is a part of a debate that dates again to the very early days of Bitcoin (BTC). Moreover, proponents of the change spotlight that it’s exhausting to make sure miners implement a rule that goes towards their very own incentives. A January 2024 evaluate revealed that miners, equivalent to F2Pool, had been already together with non-standard transactions that exceeded OP_RETURN limits.
The BIP, submitted by pseudonymous developer Dathon Ohm, is known as a “Decreased Knowledge Short-term Softfork” and suggests to “quickly restrict the scale of knowledge fields on the consensus stage.” The restrict would final till Bitcoin block 987,424, or about 1.27 years from now.
In a devoted mailing recordthe creator defined that “the concept is to strongly reaffirm in consensus that bitcoin is cash, not knowledge storage.” “After a yr, the comfortable fork expires, giving us time to give you a extra everlasting resolution,“ they mentioned.
Associated: Ordinals dev floats forking Bitcoin Core amid censorship considerations
What does BIP-444 do?
BIP-444 is a brief comfortable fork that might shut most data-embedding paths on Bitcoin, together with stricter dimension caps on outputs and pushes, bans on annex, unknown witness variations, deep Taproot bushes, OP_SUCCESS* and conditional branches. This limits Ordinal-based non-fungible token (NFT) creationmassive knowledge payloads and sophisticated scripts whereas conserving easy financial unaffected.
The BIP textual content argues that with trendy knowledge compression, it’s attainable to embed “objectionable photos (typically unlawful to even possess) in as few as 300–400 bytes.” This could enable “a malicious actor to mine a single transaction with unlawful or universally abhorrent content material and credibly declare that Bitcoin itself is a system for distributing it.”
Bitcoin developer and cypherpunk Peter Todd, alternatively, said that the strategy can be ineffective in reaching its supposed purpose. Todd demonstrated this by embedding your complete BIP-444 textual content in a Bitcoin transaction that might be compliant with the comfortable fork.
Nonetheless, the proponent of the change highlighted that sending it prices over $100 in charges and argued that if embedding unlawful knowledge is made tougher, “it will not make sense to carry node operators legally accountable.” They defined:
“If Bitcoin gives an formally supported technique of storing arbitrary knowledge […] node operators might conceivably be held accountable for possession and distribution.“
Nonetheless, some view the excellence as arbitrary and unrealistic. One X consumer demonstrated the concept by sharing two instructions that might collect knowledge from a picture saved on the Bitcoin community, highlighting how scarce the variations are in observe.
Journal: ZK-proofs are bringing sensible contracts to Bitcoin
