Bitcoin’s tape over the previous 24 hours regarded engineered for crypto traders, as BTC surpassed the $90,000 threshold within the early hours of Dec. 29, solely to present again these beneficial properties lower than 12 hours later.
Merchants like TedPillows posted clown emojis alongside charts exhibiting repeated peaks and troughs, whereas CryptoSeth known as it “fraud commodity” habits, pointing to the identical sawtooth sample replaying 30 instances.
Moreover, Wimar X blamed Binance and Wintermute outright, claiming “multi-billion greenback manipulation” seen on-chain. Nonetheless, the on-chain transfers involving Wintermute, as proven in his screenshot, totaled lower than $30 million.
Nonetheless, the query is not whether or not the accusations are baseless, however whether or not the information can distinguish between opportunistic stop-hunting and a structurally fragile, overleveraged market that breaks the identical manner each time somebody leans on it.
The microstructure tells the story
Binance’s cumulative quantity delta, which is buy-aggressor quantity minus sell-aggressor quantity amassed over time, reveals a clear sample: sharp intraday spike pushed by aggressive shopping for, CVD surging as market orders raise provides, adopted by an equally sharp reversal pushed by aggressive promoting, CVD collapsing as merchants hit bids.
Value ends roughly the place it began, web CVD near flat over the complete window.
That’s precisely what a “push by the e-book, harvest stops and late momentum, then fade it again” sequence appears to be like like. It isn’t a sluggish trend-building conviction, it is a quick up-and-down that leaves the market roughly unchanged however could be worthwhile for anybody who traded each legs.
The tape does not present who initiated the transfer or whether or not it was coordinated, nevertheless it reveals the transfer itself was pushed by aggressive directional circulation, not passive order matching. These are indicators of market manipulation.


This is not a one-off print. The identical V-shaped spikes and retraces performed out throughout Bitstamp and Bybit by December. Completely different venues, related samplerepeated over time.
That implies the setting itself is pleasant to precisely the habits merchants are accusing: a structurally fragile, overleveraged market the place somebody retains leaning into apparent cease zones as a result of it retains working.


It does not show the identical dealer every time. The market is simple to push round for anybody with sufficient measurement and pace to maneuver worth in a skinny e-book, then rebalance stock and collateral throughout venues earlier than the transfer reverses.
Somebody is stop-hunting
The tape strongly resembles a basic stop-hunt, as liquidity is skinny in the course of the vacation interval. CoinGecko information reveals that Binance is constantly staying under $10 billionwhereas different main exchanges have even did not submit $1 billion in quantity lately.
Moreover, Coinglass information reveals that open curiosity modified by 0.08%, -0.67%, and 0.03% prior to now 1 hour, 4 hours, and 24 hours, respectively.
Liquidations over these horizons totaled tens of thousands and thousands of {dollars}, break up between longs and shorts, not the large one-sided wipeouts that accompany a massively crowded commerce getting detonated.


Costs at different venues broadly tracked Binance relatively than disconnecting, indicating the transfer wasn’t remoted to 1 order e-book. And the on-chain snapshots present custody reshuffling, not the aspect of the trades or the profit-and-loss path of any specific pockets.
Skilled desks had been energetic, as on-chain information reveals over 87 BTC exiting Binance to a Wintermute deposit pockets, however what they had been doing and why stays opaque.
Taken collectively, the proof matches the sample of opportunistic profit-seeking in skinny order books. Aggressive shopping for drives Bitcoin into a pointy intraday spike, aggressive promoting walks it again, and cumulative circulation finally ends up roughly flat.
Repeated inverted V-shaped strikes throughout Bitstamp, Bybit, and Binance, plus a burst of cross-venue flows from Binance to market-maker and alternate addresses, all level to a market that is straightforward for well-capitalized merchants to push round for short-term revenue.
The proof suggests opportunistic manipulation of the tape. The habits merchants describe is believable and supported by the sample, however the information does not determine a particular orchestrator or present intent past an inexpensive doubt.
What the information does present is that the setting is structurally susceptible to precisely the type of stop-hunting merchants are accusing, and that the tape appears to be like like somebody took benefit of it.


